🇵🇹 Daily Portugal news for expats & investors — FREE Subscribe

DIAP Lisboa Brings the Rato Torture Tally to 24 PSP Detainees as Two Chiefs and 13 Agents Are Held — Ten Months After the First July 2025 Operation, the Bairro Alto File Now Includes Crimes-of-Omission Charges Against Witnessing Officers

Tuesday's third operation in the Rato/Bairro Alto torture file added 15 PSP officers and one civilian to the detainee list, taking the running total to 24 and pulling two chefes inside the perimeter. The new charges include omission — agents who watched and did nothing.

DIAP Lisboa Brings the Rato Torture Tally to 24 PSP Detainees as Two Chiefs and 13 Agents Are Held — Ten Months After the First July 2025 Operation, the Bairro Alto File Now Includes Crimes-of-Omission Charges Against Witnessing Officers

The Departamento de Investigação e Acção Penal de Lisboa ran its third operation on Tuesday in the long-running Rato/Bairro Alto torture file, adding 15 Polícia de Segurança Pública officers and one civilian — a security guard at a Lisbon nightclub — to the list of detainees. With those new arrests, the cumulative tally sits at 24 PSP elements detained since the file opened in July 2025, with nine in preventive prison and two PSP chefes now inside the perimeter alongside 13 agentes.

The operation by the numbers

Ministério Público issued 30 search warrants on Tuesday — 14 residential and 16 across PSP esquadras. Interior Minister Luís Neves told reporters in the morning that more arrests could come by end of day depending on the evidence pulled from the searches. The 15 PSP detentions came alongside the civilian arrest. The arc of the file now reads: 2 detained in July 2025, 7 added in March 2026, 15 added on 5 May 2026.

DIAP Lisboa is investigating, on the prosecution side, the alleged practice of "diversos crimes, designadamente, tortura grave, violação, abuso de poder e ofensas à integridade física qualificadas". The targets, on the victim side, are vulnerable populations: drug-dependent persons, undocumented foreign nationals, homeless people and individuals stopped for petty offences inside Rato and Bairro Alto esquadras during 2024 and 2025.

The shift in this third operation is the move toward the omission frame. The Ministério Público's working theory on most of the 15 newly detained is that they did not necessarily participate in the violence directly — but they witnessed it, did nothing to prevent it, and did not report it. The IGAI (Inspeção-Geral da Administração Interna) has three disciplinary processes open, and added a collaborative inquiry covering officers who watched videos of abuse circulated through WhatsApp groups inside the corporation. That is the evidentiary lever pulling more detentions out of the witness pool.

Why two chefes matter

The presence of two chefes among the 15 detained on Tuesday is the institutional fact. Until now, the file's prosecutorial narrative was a localised cluster of agentes inside two specific esquadras. Two chefes in handcuffs reframes the file as a chain-of-command failure — and that is the framing that will shape the parliamentary response.

The Partido Socialista has already labelled the operation a "motivo de repulsa" and is demanding a wider investigation. Chega is pushing the institutional-credibility line on the MAI minister. Inside the corporation, the union-side reaction has been cautious — the omission-of-duty charges complicate any blanket defence of the officers detained, because the conduct alleged is not a single isolated act but a circulated pattern.

What lands next

The 15 detainees were due before a juiz de instrução criminal on Tuesday and Wednesday for first interrogation, with the prosecution expected to push for tighter measures of constraint than the prior batches. Beyond that, two channels stay open. The first is whether the investigation widens beyond Rato/Bairro Alto into other Lisbon esquadras. The second is whether a chain-of-command writ runs further up — past the chefes detained on Tuesday — into the area-command level.

Both channels matter, but the omission charge is the one that changes the calculus. Once watching-and-not-reporting becomes the prosecutable conduct, the perimeter of the file is not the cluster of officers who allegedly committed acts. It is anyone who saw a WhatsApp video.